We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 12 July 15
SHIPYARD NOT LIABLE FOR ENGINE ROOM FIRE CAUSED BY OIL LEAKAGE - BIRCH WINDAHL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A Danish vessel owner requested a Danish shipyard to undertake repairs and maintenance works on its vessel. An agreement ...
Saturday, 11 July 15
MAJOR IRANIAN GAS EXPORTS WILL TAKE AT LEAST FIVE YEARS - FITCH
Iran has the long-term potential to become one of the world's top gas producers, thanks to its 34 trillion cubic meters (tcm) of natural gas re ...
Friday, 10 July 15
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS POSITIVE MOMENTUM - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has kept its positive momentum over the course of the past few days, thanks to Panamax gains. During yesterday’s session ...
Friday, 10 July 15
U.S PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY TOTALED AN ESTIMATED 14.1 MMST WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 14.1 million short ...
Thursday, 09 July 15
CPP MARKET : POSITIVE IN THE SHORT TERM - GEORGE VASTARDIS
Despite the traditionally quieter summer period, the clean tanker market has so far experienced healthy activity especially East of Suez. Increased ...
|
|
|
Showing 2931 to 2935 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Australian Coal Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
