We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 06 December 15
DRY BULK MARKET ON REVERSE MODE, SET TO BREAK NEW ALL-TIME LOWS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has been the negative “star” of the shipping industry for quite some time. In fact if it wasn’t for the boomi ...
Sunday, 06 December 15
DESPITE TEMPTING NEWBUILDING PRICES, CONTRACTING IN DRY BULK REMAINS LOW - BIMCO
The current newbuilding prices for dry bulk ships has dropped so much that they just passed the lows of 2012 heading downwards and are now at the l ...
Friday, 04 December 15
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAPS ARE ALMOST FLAT OVER WEAK DEMAND
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1 2016 declined month on month and rose slightly week over week. Coal prices seen very margi ...
Friday, 04 December 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. FOR W/E NOVEMBER 28TH FELL SLIGHTLY FROM THE PREVIOUS WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.0 million shor ...
Friday, 04 December 15
MINING OUTLOOK WEAKENS FURTHER ON FALLING CHINESE DEMAND - FITCH
COALspot.com: Fitch Ratings' outlook for the global mining sector in 2016 is firmly negative, reflecting our view that Chinese demand will cont ...
|
|
|
Showing 2671 to 2675 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
