We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 10 December 15
CANADIAN MINER TECK ANNOUNCES LNG HAUL TRUCK PILOT PROJECT
Teck Resources Limited is piloting the use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a fuel source in six haul trucks at its Fording River steelmakin ...
Thursday, 10 December 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL Q3' 16 DELIVERY SWAP WAS CLOSED 7.27% PER TON LOWER COMPARED TO AVERAGE Q1' 16 DELIVERY PRICE
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1’ 2016 decline month over month and week over week.
The Q1’ 2016 &nbs ...
Wednesday, 09 December 15
U.S. COAL EXPORTS DECLINE IN 2015 DUE TO SLOWER GROWTH IN WORLD COAL DEMAND AND LOWER INTERNATIONAL COAL PRICES - EIA
COALspot.com: The slower growth in world coal demand and lower international coal prices have contributed to a decline in U.S. coal exports in 2015 ...
Wednesday, 09 December 15
DRY BULK EXPERIENCES THE PERFECT STORM - PANOS TSILINGIRIS
Dry bulk experiences the perfect storm as the slowing of demand predominantly because of China sat atop the exaggerated oversupply. The BDI broke t ...
Tuesday, 08 December 15
OPEC'S DECISION BODES WELL FOR THE TANKER MARKET: STRONG MIDDLE EAST CRUDE EXPORTS WILL CONTINUE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
OPEC’s latest decision to keep up oil production is seen by shipbrokers as a further boost for the tanker market. At the end of last year OPE ...
|
|
|
Showing 2661 to 2665 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
