We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 04 November 22
CHINA EXPANDS COAL TERM CONTRACTS TO ALL MINES TO STABILIZE MARKET - REUTERS
China has expanded long-term thermal coal supply contracts for 2023 to all coal mines and asked power utilities to source more of their demand thro ...
Thursday, 03 November 22
HANDYSIZE VALUES MOVING UP IN OCTOBER, WHILE LNG VALUES SKYROCKET - VESSELSVALUE
Handysize values have increased this month across most ages, following a period of decline. Values for generic 10 year old Handysizes have moved up ...
Thursday, 03 November 22
EUROPEAN GAS SUPPLY SURPLUS, NOVEMBER HBA DOWN TO US$ 308.2 PER TON - ESDM
European gas supply conditions have a major influence in determining fluctuations in the Reference Coal Price (HBA). The November 2022 HBA recorded ...
Wednesday, 02 November 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Only five weeks before western sanctions’ full effect, uncertainty over energy has markets and governments on the edge. What was initially th ...
Tuesday, 01 November 22
CHINA COAL TRADE DISRUPTED BY COVID OUTBREAKS AS WINTER LOOMS - REUTERS
China’s strict COVID-19 policy is constraining coal supplies and pushing up prices, industry officials and traders say, just weeks before the ...
|
|
|
Showing 196 to 200 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PTC India Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
