We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 18 November 22
REALITIES OF LOI LIABILITIES - BALTIC EXCHANGE
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The cargo misdelivery claim in Trafigura Maritime Logistics Pte Ltd v. Clearlake Shipping Pte Ltd (Miracle Hope) [2022] E ...
Tuesday, 15 November 22
CHINA SEES RISING COAL STORAGE AMID SUPPLY PUSH - XINHUA
Coal stockpiles at China’s power plants have seen considerable increases, ensuring energy supply for the winter, the country’s energy r ...
Tuesday, 15 November 22
SEABORNE THERMAL COAL PRICES START TO EASE, BUT PROCESS IS UNEVEN - REUTERS
Prices for seaborne thermal coal have started to drop as fears of a winter energy crunch ease, but the rate of decline has varied across the differ ...
Thursday, 10 November 22
INDIA: THERMAL PLANTS HAVE ADEQUATE COAL STOCKS AT 25.6 MILLION TONNES, SAYS GOVT - IANS
The coal stock with domestic dry fuel-based power plants, as on October 31, was 25.6 million tonnes, the government said, adding that the availabil ...
Tuesday, 08 November 22
OUTLOOK ON CHINA’S WEAKENED BASIC MATERIALS SECTOR CLOUDED BY POLICY SWINGS - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings expects basic materials demand in China to improve qoq in 4Q22, driven by seasonally higher construction activity, solid infrastructu ...
|
|
|
Showing 191 to 195 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
|
| |
| |
|
