We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 21 August 17
INDIA'S COAL IMPORTS DECLINE TO 192 MT IN FY17 - PTI
Import of coal saw a decline of 6.37 per cent to 191.95 million tonnes (MT) in 2016-17 on higher production by CIL that saw the country move to a r ...
Monday, 21 August 17
FIRM DEMAND FOR CAPES CONTINUE TO SUPPORT DRY BULK SHIPPING
COALspot.com: The freight market was continued to rose this past week compared to the previous weeks, as BDI, Cape and Panamax indexes show a posit ...
Friday, 18 August 17
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT UP 2.1% WEEK OVER WEEK, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.5 million short ton ...
Thursday, 17 August 17
DESPITE A HOLIDAY-DISRUPTED WEEK IT HAS BEEN A NEW ACTIVE WEEK FOR THE PANAMAXES - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
A very quiet start to the week with holidays in several countries. USG still bringing good results supported by a tight tonnage availabl ...
Monday, 14 August 17
CENTURIES ON, AND DRY BULK STILL RULES THE WAVES... - SARAH HOLDEN | CLARKSONS
By the late 1800s, the shipping industry had been transformed by the introduction of steam power and iron ships. Coal and grain were two of the mos ...
|
|
|
Showing 1966 to 1970 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Planning Commission, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
