We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 24 August 17
SUPRAMAX: LOW $10K FOR INDO COAL TRIPS TO INDIA; AROUND $10K FOR INDO TO CHINA TRIPS - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
This week Supras from the Black Sea on fhaul have seen numerous orders and improving rates.
53-57k dwt vessels have been fixed at e ...
Wednesday, 23 August 17
THE STRONG IRON ORE TRADE ROUTES SUPPORT CAPESIZE SEGMENT - INTERMODAL
The upward trend in the Capesize segment is definitely being supported by the strong momentum in the key iron ore trade routes. The price of high-q ...
Tuesday, 22 August 17
WHAT IS A RELEASE CALL?
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Joining a mutual P&I Club means each Member shares in the fortunes of that Club and its membership. The continuity of ...
Tuesday, 22 August 17
THOSE DOG DAYS OF SUMMER STEEL PRODUCTION IN CHINA - COMMODORE
COALspot.com: One popular but inaccurate narrative that makes the rounds every June and July (and occurred again this year) is that China’s s ...
Monday, 21 August 17
BANPU REVEALS FIRST HALF 2017 WITH STRONG RESULTS; SUPPORTED BY HIGHER COAL PRICES
Banpu Reveals First Half 2017 with Strong Results from Higher Coal Prices Gearing Up to the Era of New Energy with Banpu Greener & Smarter Stra ...
|
|
|
Showing 1961 to 1965 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- White Energy Company Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
|
| |
| |
|
