We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 23 August 18
SUPRAMAX: SOME FRESH COAL CARGOES APPEARED IN SE ASIA, GIVING A BIT PRESSURE ON RATES FOR END AUGUST SHIPMENTS - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
Slightly softer but generally very healthy for the big ships, with limited supply of early tonnage and positive Brazilian ore export v ...
Wednesday, 22 August 18
KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR 480K TONS OF BITUMINOUS COAL FOR BORYEONG POWER PLANT & SHIN BORYEONG POWER PLANTS
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a tender for 480,000 mt of min. 5700 NAR coal of Australian origi ...
Wednesday, 22 August 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE PANAGOPOULOS
During the most quite week of the summer period we witnessed a trade war between United States and Turkey. A battle, which started with the arrest ...
Monday, 20 August 18
SUPRAMAX: OVERALL IT WAS A POSITIVE WEEK FOR THE BSI INDEX WITH GAINS MADE - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A week of largely unfulfilled expectations with holidays again curbing activity. Rates remained essentially healthy, but despite bad wea ...
Friday, 17 August 18
DO ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN BILLS OF LADING BIND THEIR HOLDERS? - WFW
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Bills of lading are a crucial part of the security package traditionally sought by trade finance providers.
...
|
|
|
Showing 1641 to 1645 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- White Energy Company Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- The University of Queensland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
|
| |
| |
|
