We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 28 August 18
COURT CONCLUDES DELIVERY MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TERMS OF LOIS - INCE&CO
Glencore Agriculture BV v Navig8 Chemicals Pool Inc (Songa Winds) [2018] EWCA 1901 (Civ)
In this case, the Commercial Court fo ...
Tuesday, 28 August 18
SUPRAMAX: A COAL TRIP VIA INDONESIA PAID $13,500 ON A 56,000DWT TO WC INDIA - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Singapore holiday mid-week disrupted trading and unsettled the market, with owners losing some resilience. The market took on a la ...
Tuesday, 28 August 18
SHIPPING MARKET UPDATE - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
As we edge close to the start of the Autumn Season, a period within the year that is usually characterized as the pivot point from the final quarte ...
Friday, 24 August 18
KOREAN RESTRICTIONS ON COAL SULPHUR IMPACTING HUNTER EXPORTS - THE HERALD
WARNINGS that Korean restrictions on sulphur levels in coal could hurt the Hunter industry appear to have been accurate, according to a report in t ...
Thursday, 23 August 18
RUSSIA'S MECHEL PRODUCED 9.69 MMT OF RUN-OF-MINE COAL IN 1H'2018
Mechel PAO, one of the leading Russian mining and metals companies, announces 1H2018 operational results.
Mechel PAO’s Chief E ...
|
|
|
Showing 1636 to 1640 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
