We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 13 September 18
SUPRAMAX: INDO-INDIA COAL RUN WAS FIXED CLOSE TO $16000 ON ULTRA - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
Rates took a further drop in the beginning of the week, to later find a floor around mid-week reaching mid USD 7 level for c5 and just ...
Thursday, 13 September 18
SHIPPING IS INCREASINGLY CAUGHT IN THE TRADE WAR LINE OF CROSSFIRE - PETER SAND
Once again, the already long list of tariffed goods has been made even longer. Many more commodities were hit on 23 August, but September is likely ...
Wednesday, 12 September 18
THE INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LETTERS OF INDEMNITY AND CHARTERPARTY "TIME BAR" PROVISIONS - STANDARD CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Introduction
A recent English Court of Appeal decision provides important guidance on the applicability of charterpar ...
Wednesday, 12 September 18
IS LNG POISED FOR A NEW GROWTH CYCLE? - WOOD MACKENZIE
Gas needs to work for its long-term sustainability. But the mood music is upbeat. Just 18 months ago the LNG market was depressed, anticipating an ...
Wednesday, 12 September 18
U.S. TOTAL COAL EXPORTS TO BE 107 MMST IN 2018 AND 101 MMST IN 2019 - EIA
EIA forecasts U.S. coal production will decline by 1% to 768 million short tons (MMst) in 2018, despite a 10% (10 MMst) increase in coal exports.
...
|
|
|
Showing 1621 to 1625 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The University of Queensland
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Planning Commission, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
