We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 17 September 18
GLENCORE RETURNS TO JAPAN COAL TALKS SCUPPERED BY HIGH PRICES - BLOOMBERG
Mining giant Glencore Plc and Japanese utilities have resumed thermal coal supply negotiations, restarting talks that fell apart earlier this year ...
Monday, 17 September 18
SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE WORLD FLEET WILL FIT SCRUBBERS - FORECASTS : METTE KRONHOLM FRAENDE
In recent months, there have been numerous reports of a strong pick-up in demand for scrubbers. On 1 January 2020, however, the number of ships fit ...
Saturday, 15 September 18
POWERING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITH LOW EMISSION COAL TECHNOLOGIES - WCA
In its 5th Strategic Energy Plan this year (2018), the Japanese Cabinet recognised coal as an important energy resource, necessary for the country& ...
Friday, 14 September 18
10 YEARS ON FROM LEHMAN, HOW IS SHIPPING'S "HANGOVER"? - CLARKSONS RESEARCH
On 15th September 2008, the collapse of Lehman Brothers crystallised the financial crisis and the onset the worst economic downturn for a century. ...
Thursday, 13 September 18
OPEC SEES SLOWER 2019 OIL DEMAND GROWTH, WARNS ON ECONOMY
Crude Oil Price Movements
In August, the OPEC Reference Basket declined by $1.01 m-o-m, settling at $72.26/b. Crude oil futures were also down ...
|
|
|
Showing 1616 to 1620 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Coal Association
- White Energy Company Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
