We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 13 February 19
MALAYSIA WAS THE REGION'S LARGEST COAL IMPORTER WITH 34 MT IN 2018, UP 25% Y-O-Y
Although coal market in 2018 started with strong prices, starting in the beginning of the second half of 2018, the international spot prices for co ...
Wednesday, 13 February 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
If there is one word that can describe the current shipping environment then that this word is most probably “volatility.” The sentimen ...
Saturday, 09 February 19
SUPRAMAX: A 63,000-TONNER WAS REPORTED FIXED DELIVERY FOR AN EAST KALIMANTAN TRIP, REDELIVERY WEST COAST INDIA, AT $9,250 - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Cape
The Vale disaster weighed heavily on the market for big ships, with uncertainty about shipments/future exports leading to a sharp drop in ...
Friday, 08 February 19
LOWER-QUALITY INDONESIA EXPORTS ROSE 39 MT IN 2018 YOY PRIMARILY IN RESPONSE TO INCREASED DEMAND FROM CHINA AND INDIA - PEABODY
"Underlying seaborne met and thermal coal conditions remain quite positive and the pace of U.S. coal-fueled power plant retirements is expecte ...
Thursday, 07 February 19
QATAR CAN GAIN FROM DECLINING COAL - THE PENINSULA
With North America and Europe closing down their old coal and nuclear plants, major gas exporters like Qatar can and should gain market share. With ...
|
|
|
Showing 1471 to 1475 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
