We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 26 February 19
CHINA RESTRICTS SEABORNE COAL IMPORTS - WOOD MACKENZIE
In response to news on China's Dalian port restricting seaborne coal imports, Wood Mackenzie's experts provide the following commentary.
...
Tuesday, 26 February 19
THE RELATIVELY DISAPPOINTING SCENE PORTRAYED IN THE DRY BULK MARKET RIGHT NOW - ALLIED SHIPBROKING
The relatively disappointing scene portrayed in the dry bulk market right now (especially in the Capesize segment) is undoubtedly one of the prevai ...
Friday, 22 February 19
AUSTRALIAN HIGH CV THERMAL COAL PRICES AT 19-MONTH LOW, BUT NOT FOR LONG - WOOD MACKENZIE
The benchmark Newcastle high energy thermal coal price has fallen from US$100/tonne at the turn of the new year to US$88/tonne. Thermal coal has be ...
Wednesday, 20 February 19
EFFECTIVE NOTICES OF ARBITRATION - AVOIDING WASTED COSTS AND A POTENTIALLY TIME-BARRED CLAIM
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In a recent case, The Amity [2017], charterers successfully set aside an arbitration award on the basis that ow ...
Wednesday, 20 February 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INERMODAL
Market experts mostly agree that the recent dry bulk market downtrend was caused by seasonal slowdown amid the Chinese New Year celebrations in com ...
|
|
|
Showing 1461 to 1465 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Planning Commission, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
