We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 06 April 19
AUSTRALIA COAL POSTS BIGGEST WEEKLY DROP IN A DECADE AMID WEAK DEMAND - REUTERS
Australian thermal coal prices this week registered their biggest weekly fall since the financial market turmoil of a decade ago as demand plunged ...
Saturday, 06 April 19
SUPRAMAX: IT WAS A POOR WEEK OVERALL FOR THE BALTIC SUPRAMAX INDEX, WHICH LOST GROUND - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market over the past week looked to have found a floor on Tuesday with the BCI 5TC at $3460 before firming into the rest ...
Thursday, 04 April 19
OVERSUPPLY STILL MAJOR CHALLENGE WARNS ICS
Speaking in Istanbul, Simon Bennett, Deputy Secretary General of the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) warned that avoiding overcapacity and ...
Thursday, 04 April 19
GLENCORE, TOHOKU ELECTRIC SET COAL CONTRACT PRICE AT $94.75/T - SOURCE, REUTERS REPORTED
Global miner Glencore and Japan’s Tohoku Electric Power agreed on a price of $94.75 per tonne for supplies of thermal coal from Australia for ...
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This i ...
|
|
|
Showing 1436 to 1440 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
