We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 April 19
CHEAP COAL SWELLS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA, FOILING GLOBAL GREEN PUSH - NIKKEI
Southeast Asian countries are turning to low-cost coal to satisfy their surging electricity demand as the West shies away from the fossil fuel unde ...
Monday, 08 April 19
SULPHUR 2020 - COUNTDOWN TO THE SWITCHOVER - LLOYD'S REGISTER
Sulphur 2020 (MARPOL Annex VI Reg. 14.1.3) is still dominating headlines and as we draw closer to the 1 January 2020 deadline it’s clear that ...
Monday, 08 April 19
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE PRICE PLUMMETS TO LOW NOT SEEN SINCE AUGUST 2017
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down the benchmark price of Indonesian thermal ...
Sunday, 07 April 19
SHIP PASSAGE PLANS - NO ROOM FOR ERROR! - WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The English High Court’s judgment in Alize 1954 v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (The CMA CGM Libra) is an impo ...
Sunday, 07 April 19
IMO 2020: READY OR NOT? - WOOD MACKENZIE
New Year’s Day 2020 is firmly marked in the calendar as the refining and shipping industries prepare for change.
The International Marit ...
|
|
|
Showing 1431 to 1435 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The University of Queensland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
