We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 11 August 19
ULTRAMAX: A 58,000DWT VESSEL OPEN KEMAMAN FIXED FOR TWO TO THREE LADEN LEGS, REDELIVERY SINGAPORE-JAPAN, AT $12,250 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
With typhoon Lekima gathering pace, numerous China ports were closed by the end of the week and will likely be for two to three days. ...
Tuesday, 06 August 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
On the 12th of May four tankers were attacked near the coast of Fujairah. The tankers hit were waiving international flags such as that of No ...
Monday, 05 August 19
SUPRAMAX: COAL FROM INDONESIA TO CHINA PAID AT MID $8,000S ON A 57,000-TONNER DELIVERY SOUTH CHINA - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
Having hit a high of $32,963 early last week, the Capesize 5TC now stands at $25,749. This is over 20% of its value lost in 10 days. C ...
Thursday, 01 August 19
PANAMAX: THE SENTIMENT IN THE MARKET IS STILL POSITIVE FOR THE LONGER TERM - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
Two weeks ago the 5TC index was at 33,000 USD pd. Since then it has fallen off a bit and has stayed around 27,000 USD pd the last week ...
Thursday, 01 August 19
INDIKA ENERGY REVENUES DECLINE DUE TO LOW COAL PRICES
One of the largest Indonesian integrated energy companies PT Indika Energy Tbk posted revenues of US $ 1,380.4 million, down 4.6% compared to US $ ...
|
|
|
Showing 1351 to 1355 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Planning Commission, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
|
| |
| |
|
