We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 September 19
ULTRAMAX: ASIA A 58,000-TONNER FIXED DELIVERY FUZHOU, VIA INDONESIA, REDELIVERY CHINA, AT $12,800
Capesize
0px The market reached new heights this week as the 5TC topped $38,014, a level not seen in the sector since 2013. Fridays 5TC closed ...
Wednesday, 04 September 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
For yet another time, the market seems to have its own drivers. After a very disappointing first half, the recent recovery in the shipping market i ...
Tuesday, 20 August 19
NORDEN HAS BEEN AWARDED A 3-YEAR CONTRACT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF COAL FROM INDONESIA TO HONG KONG
NORDEN has been awarded a 3-year contract with a power company in Hong Kong for the transportation of coal from Indonesia to Hong Kong.
...
Tuesday, 20 August 19
THE AUGUST 2019 INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE POSTS THE FIRST MONTHLY GAIN SINCE AUGUST 2018
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised up the benchmark price of Indonesian thermal co ...
Monday, 19 August 19
INDONESIAN COAL RUNS, A 82,000DWT SHIP WAS FIXED DELIVERY CHINA VIA INDONESIA, REDELIVERY JAPAN, IN THE MID $16,000S - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market was buoyant in both basins this week, posting gains across the board. After bottoming out the previous week, rates ...
|
|
|
Showing 1346 to 1350 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
