We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 29 December 20
CORROSION-RESISTANT STEELS FOR CARGO OIL TANKS - DNV GL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Crude oil is a complex mixture of substances at varying ratios and in most cases contains at least some salt water. ...
Tuesday, 29 December 20
CHINA COKING COAL FUTURES RISE FOR THIRD DAY ON SUPPLY WORRIES - REUTERS
Chinese coking coal futures extended gains into a third session on Monday, jumping as much as 6.2% as lower imports, sliding inventories and mines ...
Wednesday, 23 December 20
COKING COAL'S DECLINE LIKELY TO FOLLOW THE PATH OF THERMAL COAL’S PROGRESSIVE DEMISE - IEEFA
Technology disruption the likely theme of global energy markets in 2021
There has been a growing tsunami of climate commitment annou ...
Wednesday, 23 December 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As we all know, China forges more steel than the rest of the world combined, and even during this unprecedented pandemic, the nation is set to brea ...
Tuesday, 22 December 20
2021 DRY BULK OUTLOOK - SUPPLY GROWTH - TORVALD KLAVENESS
In the first article in the series we mentioned that dry bulk freight was in a super cycle between 2001 and 2008. The growth in global yard capacit ...
|
|
|
Showing 686 to 690 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Economic Council, Georgia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
