We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 04 January 21
U.S. RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSUMPTION SURPASSES COAL FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OVER 130 YEARS - EIA
In 2019, U.S. annual energy consumption from renewable sources exceeded coal consumption for the first time since before 1885, according to the U.S ...
Monday, 04 January 21
BLISS FOR SHIPOWNERS! DAMAGES MAY BE CLAIMED IN ADDITION TO DEMURRAGE FOR VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY DELAY - WFW
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In a significant decision for the maritime sector, The Eternal Bliss[1], the English Commercial Court has resol ...
Sunday, 03 January 21
INDIA: COMMERCE MINISTRY LAUNCHES COAL IMPORT MONITORING SYSTEM - PTI
CIMS shall require importers to submit advance information in an online system for imports of items and obtain an automatic registration number by ...
Wednesday, 30 December 20
A LOOK BACK INTO 2020: THE HEADWINDS, THE TAILWINDS AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN - SIGNAL
There is no doubt that 2020 has been a turbulent year for commercial shipping. The coronavirus pandemic has shaken the global maritime transport. T ...
Tuesday, 29 December 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.66 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 134.78 points Monday, up 0.66 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
|
|
|
Showing 681 to 685 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PTC India Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
