We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 01 April 09
COAL FIRMS' PROFITS NOT EXPECTED TO GROW IN '09 - - THE JAKARTA POST (ANALYSTS)
Despite their windfall profits in 2008, analysts doubt that PT Bumi Resources Tbk or any other coal firms will post profit growth this year, with pr ...
Tuesday, 31 March 09
DEUTSCHE BANK TO ADD COAL, GAS, SHIPPING IN COMMODITY EXPANSION - BLOOMBERG
Deutsche Bank AG, after quadrupling revenue from commodities in two years, plans to add coal, European natural-gas and shipping to its business, ant ...
Monday, 30 March 09
CHINA SHENHUA SAYS AGREES DOMESTIC COAL DEALS - REUTERS
Chinese coal mining giant China Shenhua Energy Co has agreed long-term contracts with some Chinese power producers, its President Ling Wen said on M ...
Sunday, 29 March 09
SHENHUA ENERGY 2008 NET RISES 29% TO RECORD ON PRICES - BLOOMBERG
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd., the nation’s biggest coal producer, said profit rose 29 percent to a record in 2008 after it increased productio ...
Friday, 27 March 09
SOUTH AFRICAN COAL EXPORTS EXPECTED TO RISE IN 2009, BUT RAIL WILL DETERMINE BY HOW MUCH - MININGWEEKLY
South Africa has an expanding coal-export terminal, but an uncertain rail capacity.
The mismatch is something South Africa cannot afford, given i ...
|
|
|
Showing 6821 to 6825 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Coal Association
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
