We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 06 April 09
RICHARDS BAY COAL TERMINAL EXPORTS ROSE 5 PERCENT IN MARCH - BLOOMBERG
South Africa’s Richards Bay Coal Terminal, the world’s largest coal-export facility, shipped 5 percent more coal in March than the same ...
Monday, 06 April 09
INDIA'S OSWAL CHEM EYES INDONESIAN COAL MINES -ECONOMICTIMES
Oswal Chemicals and Fertilisers (OCFL), part of Abhay Oswal-led Oswal group, has initiated talks with three separate Indonesian coal firms to ...
Thursday, 02 April 09
FOREIGNERS ALSO CHEER FOR INDONESIA'S THE NEW MINING LAW - MAJALA TAMBANG
Three mining giants, Australia's Rio Tinto along with Canada's Barrick Gold and Southern Arc, are among foreign corporations currently applying fo ...
Wednesday, 01 April 09
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT REVISES MINING REVENUE TARGET DOWN 26% - THE JAKARTA POST
Government income from mining this year, excluding taxes, is expected to drop by about 26 percent to Rp 11 trillion ($957 million), primarily becaus ...
Wednesday, 01 April 09
INDONESIAN OFFICIAL CLAIMS NEW LEGISLATION IS VINDICATED AS OVERSEAS FIRMS LINE UP FOR MINING LICENSES - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry is expected to issue six mining licenses under the country’s new mining law over the next two months ...
|
|
|
Showing 6816 to 6820 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Parliament of New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
