We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 30 July 09
PNOC FORGES JOINT VENTURES AS STEPS UP COAL OPERATIONS
The Philippine National Oil Co.-Exploration Corp. has entered joint venture agreements with food and beverage conglomerate San Miguel and Filipinas ...
Thursday, 30 July 09
NAMANE OF SOUTH AFRICA IN SUDAN COAL DEAL, BUSINESS REPORT SAYS
Namane of South Africa in Sudan Coal Deal, Business Report Says
Namane Resources Ltd. of South Africa signed a coal-supply agreement with the Nat ...
Wednesday, 29 July 09
RP COAL DEMAND TO SURGE BY 2014 - PHILIPPINES UPDATE
CEBU, Philippines - With the entry of new coal-fired power generation plants in the Philippines, the Department of Energy (DOE) projected an increas ...
Wednesday, 29 July 09
INDIA HUNGRY FOR OUR COKING COAL ASSETS
The Australian reported that, INDIA is about to embark on a program of rapid coal sector acquisitions in Australia as it looks to plug a huge annual ...
Tuesday, 28 July 09
SHENZHEN ENERGY INKS COAL PURCHASE CONTRACT WITH CHINA SHENHUA
China Knowledge reported that, Shenzhen Energy Group Co Ltd has signed a five-year contract with China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd, which is engaged in th ...
|
|
|
Showing 6546 to 6550 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|