We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 06 August 09
CASES FILED AGAINST ESSAR ALGOMA OVER TERMINATED COAL SHIPMENTS
Steel Guru reported that, It is reported that units of International Coal Group Inc and Arch Coal Inc have filed federal lawsuits in the same court ...
Thursday, 06 August 09
COMPULSORY MINE RECLAMATION PROPOSED FOR A MINING'S LIFETIME
Tambang reported that, A data from the Forestry Ministry showed that almost 65 percent of mining activities operated under contract of work, c ...
Thursday, 06 August 09
MINING PERMITS FOR THOSE COMMITTED TO SMELTER DEVELOPMENT ONLY
Tambang reported tht, Concrete and tangible endeavors are key to guarantee the attainment of added value from mining sector. The Indonesian Ministry ...
Thursday, 06 August 09
PRESS RELEASE - CZECH COAL CONTESTS THE J&T AND IPO MERGER
Prague, 3 August 2009 - The Czech Coal Group filed today objections to the proposed merger of the J&T Group and International Power Opatovice (I ...
Wednesday, 05 August 09
SMALLER DRY BULK CARRIERS TO FARE BETTER UNTIL THE END OF 2009 - SHIPPING
Marcor Shipping reported that, Smaller ship types are expected to outtake larger ones in dry bulk trade for the period until the end of the year. Th ...
|
|
|
Showing 6536 to 6540 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- White Energy Company Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Australian Coal Association
- Planning Commission, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
|
| |
| |
|
