We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 11 August 09
ZAMBIAN COAL BUYERS CONTINUE IMPORTING COAL FROM ZIMBABWE
Lusaka Times reported that, Coal mining companies have bemoaned the lack of market for their produce as prospective buyers continue importing the co ...
Monday, 10 August 09
NOMINAL HIKE IN COAL PRICES SOON - MEDIA
The hindu business reported that, a marginal hike in coal prices is in the offing. "I will be soon approaching the Prime Minister on the matter ...
Monday, 10 August 09
MANGALAM CEMENT PLACES ORDER FOR CAPTIVE POWER PLANT
Steel Guru reported that, Mangalam Cement Ltd has announced that the company on August 6th 2009 finalized order for Captive Thermal Power Plant of 1 ...
Monday, 10 August 09
VIET NAM COAL EXPORTS HIT 13.5 MILLION TONNES
VietNamNet Bridge reported that, Viet Nam exported more than 13.5 million tonnes of coal in the first seven months of this year, equal to the same p ...
Monday, 10 August 09
S.KOREA KOSPO ISSUES SPOT, TERM COAL TENDERS
Korea Southern Power Co Ltd (KOSPO) is seeking 1.5 million tonnes of steam coal per year for delivery from October 2009 through September 2012 via a ...
|
|
|
Showing 6516 to 6520 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|
