We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 August 09
COAL INDIA TO IMPORT 4 MLN T 2009/10 - MEDIA
State-run Coal India Ltd plans to directly import 4 million tonnes of coal in the current fiscal year to March 2010, Chairman Partha Bhattacharyya s ...
Wednesday, 12 August 09
CHINA'S LARGEST COAL PRODUCER TO SET UP COAL RESERVES
China's National Development and Reform Commission has commissioned China Shenhua Energy Co., the nation's largest coal producer, to build 10 stor ...
Wednesday, 12 August 09
NALCO SMELTER CONSTRUCTION MAY FACE DELAY
The Jakarta Post reported that, India’s state-run National Aluminum Company (Nalco) may postpone the construction of an aluminum smelter in In ...
Wednesday, 12 August 09
COAL MINE PLAN SHOT DOWN OVER GREEN CONCERNS
The Times of India reported that, In a major setback to Adani Powers, the principal chief conservator of forests (PCCF) has rejected its proposal fo ...
Tuesday, 11 August 09
INDONESIA'S COAL EXPORTS TO INDIA WILL BE EXEMPTED FROM DUTIES STARTING JANUARY 1, 2013 - BERITA SORE
Berita sore reported that, ASEAN is scheduled to sign a long-awaited Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with India in Bangkok on Thursday aimed at boosting ...
|
|
|
Showing 6511 to 6515 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Australian Coal Association
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
