We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 14 December 09
SOUTH AFRICAN STEAM COAL PRICES FIRMING UP FOR Q1 TRADE
Reuters reported that Q1 South African coal prices firmed again slightly largely on Asian demand but European delivered prices were little changed.
...
Sunday, 13 December 09
THE FREIGHT MARKET SEEMS TO BE COMING OFF A BIT AND THE MARKET MAY BE SOFT NEXT WEEK - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com (Singapore): "The market softened this week especially in the Cape and Panamax segment , where as the Supramax and Handy size was ...
Sunday, 13 December 09
NAPOCOR CUTS COAL IMPORT PROJECTION FOR 2010
STATE-RUN National Power Corp. slashed its planned coal importation for 2010 to only 200,000 metric tons from 3.4 million MT this year, as the gover ...
Sunday, 13 December 09
CHINESE BUYERS SEEK LARGE TONNAGE OF SOUTH AFRICA STEAM COAL
Reuters reported that Chinese utilities on the coast and inland are seeking several cape cargoes each of South African coal for 2010 delivery becaus ...
Saturday, 12 December 09
QUEENSLAND APPROVES A$4 BILLION COAL TERMINAL PROJECT
Queensland’s state government said it has signed a mandate approving development of the A$4 billion ($3.7 billion) Wiggins Island coal termina ...
|
|
|
Showing 6176 to 6180 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
