We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 16 December 09
INDONESIA'S FIRST PRIVATE RAILWAY TO BOOST RAK'S MINING INTERESTS
MEC infra to invest $1b in construction of 130-km transport link
A 130-kilometre railway that will ease the transport of raw materials and finish ...
Tuesday, 15 December 09
KOMIPO HAS ISSUED A NEW TENDER FOR 30000 MT OF 5200 NAR KCAL/KG COAL
COALspot.com (South Korea): South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) has issued an new tender for prompt supply of 30000 M ...
Tuesday, 15 December 09
CHINA CUTS IMPORT DUTIES ON COAL, RAISES FOR OTHERS
China will lower import duties on more than 600 products next year, including coal, naphtha and phosphate ore, the Finance Ministry said on Tuesday. ...
Tuesday, 15 December 09
NTPC'S COAL WOES UNLIKELY TO END SOON
State-owned power producer NTPC’s woes over shortages of coal may not end soon. Though the company is importing 12.5 million tonnes of coal&nb ...
Monday, 14 December 09
RICHARDS BAY COAL TO FINISH EXPANSION IN 1ST QUARTER
Richards Bay Coal Terminal, which ships more than a quarter of Europe’s energy coal, said it will complete its Phase 5 expansion project in th ...
|
|
|
Showing 6171 to 6175 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- The University of Queensland
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
