We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 19 December 09
THE FUTURES FOR 2010 - 2012 FIRMED UP COMPARED TO LAST WEEK AND WAS AT AROUND CAPE US$ 28,000 PER DAY - VISTAAR
COALspot.com (Singapore): The freight market continued to soften this week with major drop in the cape size index by almost 21 pct and Panamax , Sup ...
Friday, 18 December 09
CARGOTEC WINS IBJ'S BEST SHIP LOADING / UNLOADING SYSTEM AWARD WITH SIWERTELL
Cargotec’s Siwertell ship unloader has recently won International Bulk Journal’s best ship loading/unloading system award for 2009; out ...
Friday, 18 December 09
THERMAL COAL PROJECT MOVES AHEAD
A proposal for Australia's largest thermal coal project in Queensland's central west has taken a step forward.
Hancock Prospecting is proposing ...
Friday, 18 December 09
CHURCHILL MINING COMPLETES FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR EAST KUTAI COAL PROJECT
Churchill Mining Plc has announced the completion of the feasibility study for its flagship project, the 75% held East Kutai coal project in Indones ...
Friday, 18 December 09
COKING COAL SHORTAGE IN CHINA TO SPUR DEMAND FIGHT WITH JAPAN
China, the world’s largest steelmaker, faces a shortage of coking coal that may drive imports next year and spur a fight for resources with Ja ...
|
|
|
Showing 6156 to 6160 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
|
| |
| |
|
