We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 24 December 09
EUROSEAS LTD. ANNOUNCES TWO-YEAR TIME CHARTER AGREEMENT FOR PANAMAX BULK CARRIER
Euroseas Ltd., an owner and operator of drybulk carriers and container vessels and provider of seaborne transportation for dry bulk and containerize ...
Wednesday, 23 December 09
INDONESIA POWER CHIEF TO BUILD PLANTS OUTSIDE JAVA
Indonesia's state electricity firm plans to build new power plants outside Java island with a combined capacity of around 2,000 megawatts to resolv ...
Wednesday, 23 December 09
BUKIT ASAM SEES CHINA COAL DEMAND BOOST
* Rebound in prices to have pushed up 2009 revs
* To more than double Tarahan port capacity
Reuters reported that, Indonesian state-owned coal m ...
Wednesday, 23 December 09
MACARTHUR COAL OFFERS TO BUY RIVAL GLOUCESTER
Queensland-based Macarthur Coal will offer to buy fellow Australian Gloucester Coal, in a move to add two new mines and increase coal resources.
...
Tuesday, 22 December 09
CHINA CONTRACTED COAL PRICE FOR 2010 SEES SLIGHT INCREASE
A number of coal and power enterprises have concluded their annual power-coal supply contracts for 2010, and the contracted coal price saw slight in ...
|
|
|
Showing 6146 to 6150 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- MS Steel International - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|