We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 21 January 10
HANDYMAX - SHORT PERIOD OWNERS IDEAS ARE AROUND MID/LOW 20S - FEARNLEYS AS
HANDY
The BSI moved in a downward direction since last Friday reflecting minor a ...
Thursday, 21 January 10
ASF GROUP TO COMMENCE COAL SALES TO CHINA BY FEBRUARY 2010
Sydney-based China energy and resource conduit, ASF Group has struck an agreement to supply coal to China.
In September 2009, ASF announced a ven ...
Thursday, 21 January 10
INDONESIA BUKIT ASAM AGREES ON LOWER COAL PRICE
Indonesian state coal miner PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam Tbk has agreed with a local power plant to set 2010 coal prices at 23 percent lower than ...
Thursday, 21 January 10
CABOTAGE POLICY POSTPONED
The Transportation Ministry has decided to postpone for one year the full enforcement of the cabotage principle – a maritime term for the proh ...
Thursday, 21 January 10
MEC IN TALKS WITH TATA POWER ON COAL - TRADE
The UAE's Middle East Coal is in talks to supply coal to Tata Power, India's biggest private sector power firm, from its new Indonesian operations ...
|
|
|
Showing 6066 to 6070 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The University of Queensland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
|
| |
| |
|