We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 25 January 10
MINING GROUPS MAY SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW OF 2009 LAW
Indonesia’s mining associations said on Wednesday that they planned to seek a judicial review of the 2009 Mining Law this year if they are una ...
Monday, 25 January 10
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT TO ISSUE REGULATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF MINERAL AND COAL MINING BUSINESS ACTIVITIES LAW NO.4 / 2009 SOON
COALspot.com (Indonesia): The government regulation concerning implementation of mineral and coal mining business activities Law no.4 / 2009 is expe ...
Monday, 25 January 10
DUQM IWPP'S COAL REQUIREMENTS PROJECTED AT 3MT PER YEAR
Oman's first coal-fired Independent Water and Power Project (IWPP) planned at Duqm is envisaged to have a feedstock requirement of around 3 million ...
Monday, 25 January 10
THE FUTURES FOR CAPE, PANAMAX AND SUPRAMAX FOR THREE YEARS (2010 - 2012) WAS AT AROUND US$ 32,000, US$ 20,000 AND US$ 17,000 PER DAY RESPECTIVELY
COALspot.com ( Singapore): The freight market remained flat this week the market slight soft.
BDI INDEX
The BDI was down by 95 points and closed ...
Saturday, 23 January 10
COAL CAMARADERIE
Union coal minister Shriprakash Jaiswal feels Asian countries should join hands in developing minerals, particularly coal.
At the third Asian Min ...
|
|
|
Showing 6056 to 6060 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PTC India Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Australian Coal Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
