We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 04 February 10
NO AMDAL, NO COAL MINING IN KALIMANTAN: MINISTRY
To prevent further environmental damage, the government has said it would revoke the licenses of mining firms operating in Kalimantan that do not ha ...
Thursday, 04 February 10
ANTICIPATING DOMESTIC COAL DEMAND
Indonesia has an abundant amount of coal reserves, which in 2008 is estimated at 7,12 billion tones. Coal production in 2008 reached 231,18 mi ...
Wednesday, 03 February 10
CHINA'S MAIN COAL PRICES FALL AS WINTER DEMAND EASES
Weekly coal prices at China's Qinhuangdao port, a benchmark in the world's biggest producer and consumer of the fuel, fell for the first time in s ...
Wednesday, 03 February 10
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS RISE 3%; SHIP QUEUE SHORTENS
Coal shipments from Australia’s Newcastle port, the world’s biggest export harbor for the fuel, increased 3 percent last week while the ...
Wednesday, 03 February 10
INDONESIA BUKIT ASAM SEES DOUBLE DIGIT 2010 REV GROWTH
* 2009 net profit rose an estimated 50 pct
* Sees opportunities for overseas acquisitions
Indonesian state-owned coal miner Bukit Asam saw 2009 ...
|
|
|
Showing 6031 to 6035 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Coal Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Planning Commission, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
