We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 04 February 10
COAL PRODUCTION EXPECTED TO REACH 280 MILLION METRIC TONS - INDONESIA UPDATE
Indonesia`s coal production target for 2010 has been set at 275 million to 280 million metric tons, according to the Association of Indonesian Coal ...
Thursday, 04 February 10
MASSEY CEO 'NOT EXCITED' ABOUT PROSPECT OF QUARTERLY COAL PRICING
US coal producer Massey Energy is not in favour of switching to a quarterly pricing schedule for metallurgical coal, from the current annual price b ...
Thursday, 04 February 10
BUKIT ASAM GOES SHOPPING FOR MORE COAL MINES
State-owned coal miner PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam has set aside Rp 1.5 trillion ($162 million) to acquire two coal mines in East Kalimantan, pre ...
Thursday, 04 February 10
PTT EYES OVERSEAS COAL
Revenue could reachUS$600 million a year
PTT Plc, Thailand's largest energy company, aims to raise the annual revenue from its overseas coal bus ...
Thursday, 04 February 10
RI TO GRADUALLY STOP COAL EXPORTS
Indonesia, which over the past few years has become the world`s third largest coal exporter after Australia and China, is planning to gradually stop ...
|
|
|
Showing 6026 to 6030 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Planning Commission, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Coal Association
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
