We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 26 February 10
BANPU PROFITS SURGE BY 54% TO RECORD B14BN ON BRISK SALES
Banpu Plc, Asean's largest coal miner, said its earnings surged to a record high of 14.23 billion baht last year, an increase of 54% on the previou ...
Thursday, 25 February 10
INDO / INDIA COAL TRIPS SUPRAS CAN ACHIEVE AROUND MID 10S - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The BSI regained positive momentum exactly a week ago and the Atlantic rema ...
Thursday, 25 February 10
STEEP RISE IN COAL IMPORTS REQUIRED TO POWER INDIA - MONEYLIFE
The power ministry has estimated coal imports of 48 million tonnes in FY10-11, sharply higher than the expected imports of 28mt in the current fisca ...
Wednesday, 24 February 10
CHINA IMPORTED 8.81 MLN TONS OF INDONESIAN COAL IN JANUARY 2010
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world largest coal exporter, exported 24.38 million tons of coal last month, compared with 27.46 million tons in a ...
Tuesday, 23 February 10
TRENDS..... DRY BULK MARKET .... TRENDS
The dry bulk market was pulled along by the Capes this week, as fresh enquiry breathed temporary life back into the market. Short period rates also ...
|
|
|
Showing 5971 to 5975 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
