We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 04 March 10
THE INDIAN MARKET WAS STILL STRONG - FEARNRESEARCH
HANDY
Activity has gradually improved in the Atlantic throughout the week. All areas&n ...
Thursday, 04 March 10
GLOBAL COAL PRICES GETS SUPPORT FROM EM DEMAND
Commodity Online reported that, AP12 coal prices look well supported in 2010 thanks to positive outlook for Chinese coal demand whereas coal demand ...
Thursday, 04 March 10
THREE NEW GLOBAL PRICES INDEXES FOR COKING COAL
Commodity Online reported that, On February 26, Energy Publishing Co. broke new ground in the coal-marketing industry when it began publishing three ...
Tuesday, 02 March 10
INDIA WAS AGAIN THE WINNER IN THE EAST, WITH SUPRAMAXES FIXING CLOSE TO US$40,000/DAY FROM THE WEST COAST
There was little movement in the BDI this week but behind the scenes, the Supramax and Handy size segments posted significant gains, correcting the ...
Tuesday, 02 March 10
INDONESIA'S PROTECTED FORESTS NOW OPEN TO DEVELOPMENT
The Jakarta Globe reported that, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has signed a decree to allow mining, power plants and other projects deemed stra ...
|
|
|
Showing 5961 to 5965 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
|
| |
| |
|
