We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 01 June 10
LANCO INFRATECH PLANS POWER PROJECTS IN COASTAL REGIONS
My digital reported that, Hyderabad-based Lanco Infratech will set up power projects in coastal regions based on imported coal. The company is ...
Monday, 31 May 10
NEWCASTLE WEEKLY EXPORTS RISE; SHIP QUEUE SHORTENS
Business week reported that, Coal shipments from Australia’s Newcastle port, the world’s biggest export harbor for the fuel used in powe ...
Saturday, 29 May 10
FREIGHT MARKET SEEMS TO BE STABILIZING - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: The week was clearly for Cape which went up by almost 21 pct . The BDI was up only by 6 pct.
The other sectors were under pressure ...
Friday, 28 May 10
BERAU COAL GROUP SEEKS US$ 700 M LOAN
PT Bukit Mutiara has decided to revise down its bond issue from US$600 million to US$400 million. In total, it is seeking US$700 million of debt, co ...
Friday, 28 May 10
CHINESE BAN TO HIT INDIAN IRON ORE EXPORTS
Nearly half of India's iron ore exports to China are in serious danger of being wiped out. The local government has imposed a ban on import of low ...
|
|
|
Showing 5801 to 5805 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The University of Queensland
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PTC India Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
