We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 03 June 10
GOVT CONSIDERING IMPORT PARITY PRICE FOR DOMESTIC COAL
The government on June 1 said it is considering to price domestic coal on par with global rates, a move which may increase the cost of the raw mater ...
Wednesday, 02 June 10
SRI LANKA TESTS 1ST COAL POWER PLANT IN SEPT.
Sri Lanka will start testing its first 300 MegaWatt coal power plant in September with plans to connect it to the national distribution grid by Janu ...
Wednesday, 02 June 10
CHINA'S IRON ORE IMPORTS TO KEEP BEING THE BIGGEST FACTOR FOR DRY BULK FREIGHT RATES SAY READERS
With dry bulk freight rates staging a positive rally during most of May, the industry’s main benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) has managed ...
Wednesday, 02 June 10
KIDECO TO PRODUCE 29.5 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN 2010
COALspot.com: Kideco to produce 29.5 million tons of coal in 2010 up 4.8 million or about 19 percent up from 2009 production. Kideco produced 24.7 m ...
Wednesday, 02 June 10
PLN TO DEVOUR 133 PERCENT MORE COAL IN NEXT FIVE YEARS
The Jakarta globe reported that, State electricity company PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara will more than double the amount of coal it uses over the ne ...
|
|
|
Showing 5796 to 5800 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Planning Commission, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- MS Steel International - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
