We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 25 June 10
INDIAS THIRD-LARGEST SHIPPING COMPANY BAGS US$ 31 MILLION DEAL WITH SL
Daily Mirror reported that, Mainboard-listed and India-owned dry bulk shipping firm Mercator Lines says it has won a US$ 31 million contract in Sri ...
Friday, 25 June 10
DEMAND FOR COAL COULD BE GRADUALLY RETURNING - FEARNBULK
Handy
Atlantic markets seeing more activity today (23 June 2010) after a slump the last weeks. Supramax vessels open in USG are achieving low/mid ...
Thursday, 24 June 10
INDONESIAS BUMI DECLARED US$ 57.1 MILLION (AMOUNTING TO 30% OF 2009 NET INCOME) AS DIVIDEND
COALspot.com: PT Bumi Resources, Tbk’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) today was successfully held with a quorum of 75.89% resulting in sharehold ...
Thursday, 24 June 10
CHINA TARGETS 3.6 BILLION MT ANNUAL COAL OUTPUT FOR 2015
At a forum in Beijing entitled "Chinese energy strategy and energy development in the 12th five-year plan period (2011-2015)", He Youguo, ...
Thursday, 24 June 10
DRY BULK MARKET AT LOWEST POINT IN EIGHT MONTHS
The dry bulk market’s demise has failed to turn around so far this week, with the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), yest ...
|
|
|
Showing 5761 to 5765 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
