We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 June 10
U.S. STEAM COAL EXPORTS TO SUPPORT FREIGHT RATES
Booming North American coal exports to China, driven by the country's insatiable need for steel raw materials, will provide support to freight rate ...
Tuesday, 29 June 10
EXPORT LETTER OF CREDIT PLAN DUMPED - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakartaglobe reported that, Indonesia has canceled a proposed regulation that would have required exporters of commodities such as cocoa, coffee ...
Tuesday, 29 June 10
BUMA TO MOVE AROUND 333 MLN BCM OF OVERBURDEN IN 2010
COALspot.com: PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk, holding company of Indonesia's second largest coal mining contractor PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama (BUMA), ...
Tuesday, 29 June 10
DRY BULK'S DOWNFALL FINALLY SHOWING SIGNS OF STABILIZATION
Although the dry bulk market has begun the week where it left off, that is on a downward note, brokers and charterers appear to be on the consensus ...
Monday, 28 June 10
REVISIONS SHOULD AIM MINERAL AND COAL LAW
VIVAnews reported that, the Consortium of Mineral, Coal and Geothermal-Producing Regional Governments (Minerbapabum) is asking the government to per ...
|
|
|
Showing 5751 to 5755 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
