We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 16 July 10
CHINA EXPORTS 10.14 MILLION TONNES OF COAL IN H1 OF 2010
China exported 10.14 million tonnes of coal in the first half of this year, down 13.1% compared with the corresponding period of last year, accordin ...
Thursday, 15 July 10
SMC TO PURSUE MINDANAO COAL MINING PROJECTS
Philippine Daily Inquirer reported that, DIVERSIFYING CONGLOMERATE San Miguel Corp. is inclined to pursue its coal mining projects in Mindanao ...
Thursday, 15 July 10
ADANI ENTERPRISES WILL BUY $1 BILLION COAL MINE FROM LINC ENERGY - TOP NEWS
Top News reported that, Adani Enterprises has almost managed to obtain a coal mine from Linc Energy for $1 billion in Queensland, Australia. This mi ...
Thursday, 15 July 10
ADANI TO DEVELOP COAL EXPORT TERMINAL IN AUSTRALIA - BUSINESS STANDARD
Business-Standard reported that, The Adani Group, promoter of Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone (MPSEZ), today said it has been selected as the ...
Thursday, 15 July 10
NO IMPROVEMENT IN THE DRY BULK MARKET - INTERMODAL
Broker’s insight
With the Baltic Dry Index today (13/7/2010) standing at 1,790 points - the lowest point since early May 2009 - ...
|
|
|
Showing 5721 to 5725 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
