We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 20 July 10
DRY BULK SHIPPING MARKET FINDING SOME SUPPORT, AS OWNERS TAKE CAPE SIZES OFF THE MARKET
With the Baltic Dry Index finally having reached bottom, at least according to market analysts, the dry bulk industry is looking to begin its long r ...
Monday, 19 July 10
INDONESIA EXPORTS 24.49 MILLION TONNES OF COAL IN JUNE 2010
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world largest coal exporter, exported 141.249 million tons of coal in the first half of this year. In June 2010, Indone ...
Monday, 19 July 10
CHINA ONCE AGAIN DOMINATING SHIPPING FREIGHT RATES, WHILE OVERSUPPLY OF TONNAGE RAISES CONCERN
The ending of the week brought a cheerful note among dry bulk ship owners, as the sinking benchmark of the industry, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) fina ...
Saturday, 17 July 10
THE DRY BULK MARKET CONTINUED THE DOWNWARD TREND - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: The indices continued the downward trend this week also with BDI at 1,720 points and cape size index at 1676 points and the charter ra ...
Saturday, 17 July 10
BULLISH OUTLOOK FOR COKING COAL - MINING MX & HELLENIC SHIPPING
Mining Mx reported that, the coking coal market has better long-term fundamentals than the iron ore market, according to a recent research rep ...
|
|
|
Showing 5716 to 5720 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Planning Commission, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
