We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 01 June 21
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.02 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 160.06 points Monday, down 0.02 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
Tuesday, 01 June 21
BUMA PRODUCED 11.4 MILLION TONNES OF COAL IN 4Q 2020, 5% LOWER COMPARED TO 12.2 MILLION TONNES IN 4Q 2019
PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk. presents its newsletter with consolidated financial and operating results that include its primary and wholly-owne ...
Sunday, 30 May 21
PAKISTAN IS PLANNING TO END COAL IMPORTS, WORSENING OUTLOOK FOR SOUTH AFRICAN COAL - IEEFA
The growing and irreversible risks being faced by South African coal exporters
As Thungela Resources’ CEO attempts to talk up ...
Sunday, 30 May 21
G7 COAL FINANCE EXIT AND WHY IT MATTERS FOR INDIA - IEEFA
While India doesn’t rely on export credit finance to fund new coal plants, there are material implications
The commitment by the Group o ...
Saturday, 29 May 21
SKULD’S IMO 2020 SULPHUR CAP EXPERIENCE
More than a year has passed since the International Maritime Organization (IMO) mandate for the 0.50% sulphur cap for marine fuel (MARPOL Annex VI) ...
|
|
|
Showing 566 to 570 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Coal Association
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
|
| |
| |
|
