We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 05 June 21
IT'S TIME FOR THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO CHAMPION RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE PHILIPPINES, NOT NUCLEAR OR FOSSIL GAS - IEEFA
Fossil gas and nuclear investments risk locking in costly, outdated infrastructure for the long-term
The United States has spent the ...
Friday, 04 June 21
NEW COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS IN INDIA WILL BE ECONOMICALLY UNVIABLE - IEEFA
Coal capacity additions face major stranded asset risk
Much of India’s 33 gigawatts (GW) of coal-fired power capacity currently under co ...
Thursday, 03 June 21
JUNE HBA IS HITTING ABOVE $100 AND SETTLED AT ITS HIGHEST SINCE OCTOBER 2020
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal price reference for June 2021 settles at US$ 100.33 per ton FOB vessel.
The Indonesia coal pr ...
Wednesday, 02 June 21
INDONESIA RV WAS DOWN TO LOW/MID $20,000S DAY FOR PANAMAX/KAMSARMAX WITH DELIVERY S CHINA - BANCHERO COSTA
Panamax
A softening week in the Pacific basin with rates under a downward pressure mainly caused by the oversupply of tonnage in the area, said ...
Wednesday, 02 June 21
EUROPEAN UNION'S IRON ORE IMPORTS - BANCHERO COSTA
The European Union (27) is currently the fourth largest importer of iron ore in the world, after China, Japan, and South Korea.
Euro ...
|
|
|
Showing 561 to 565 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The University of Queensland
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PTC India Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
