We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 25 September 10
PRESSURE ON S6 AND S7 ROUTES SEEMS TO BE CONTINUED NEXT WEEK CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market has been flat this week due to holidays in China and low activity saw all sectors down and soft.
The BDI was dow ...
Thursday, 23 September 10
CHURCHILL MINING SHARES JUMP ON EAST KUTAI COAL PROJECT FEASIBILITY RESULTS - STOCKOPEDIA
AIM listed mining group Churchill Mining (LON:CHL) and its Indonesian partners the Ridlatama Group, have completed a feasibility study on the 2.73bn ...
Thursday, 23 September 10
DRY BULK RATES EXPECTEDLY FALL TO ONE MONTH LOWS - HELLENIC SHIPPING
With of the Far East trade routes closed this week on various national holidays, demand for ocean transportation of raw materials has been significa ...
Wednesday, 22 September 10
INDIA TO BE BIGGEST BUYER OF INDONESIAN COAL BY 2011 - BUSINESS STANDARD
India will pass Japan to be the biggest buyer of Indonesian coal by 2011, said Bob Kamandanu, chairman of the Indonesian Coal Mining Association.
...
Wednesday, 22 September 10
DRY BULK MARKET SENTIMENT TURNS SOUTH AS IRON ORE DEMAND DECLINES
The dry bulk market has once again turned the tide, with the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) turning south during the previou ...
|
|
|
Showing 5596 to 5600 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
|
| |
| |
|
