We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 30 September 10
DRY BULK MARKET HEADS SOUTH ONCE MORE WITH MARKET SENTIMENT TAKING A CAUTIOUS APPROACH - HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market didn’t manage to maintain the slightly upward momentum it had established during the first two session of the week, with t ...
Wednesday, 29 September 10
MOZAMBIQUE: COAL IN THREE MORE TETE DISTRICTS
All africa reported that, Coal deposits have been confirmed in the districts of Changara, Cahora Bassa and Magoe, in the western Mozambican province ...
Tuesday, 28 September 10
MMTC TO AWARD CONTRACT TO CEPL AND KNOWLEDGE TO SUPPLY 0.835 MILLION TONS OF IMPORTED COAL
COALspot.com: MMTC, India’s state owned trading company has opened three coal purchase tenders today.
According to our market sources, Coas ...
Monday, 27 September 10
DRY BULK: FREIGHT RATES CONTINUE TO FALL ON LOW ACTIVITY - HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market didn’t manage to change its fortunes during the past week, with holidays across many Asian countries, predominantly China, ...
Saturday, 25 September 10
INDONESIA HAS EXPORTED 187.656 MILLION TONNES OF COAL IN EIGHT MONTHS
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world largest coal exporter has exported 187.656 million tons of coal for the period January – August this ...
|
|
|
Showing 5591 to 5595 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Planning Commission, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|