We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 13 December 10
NALCO TO START WORK ON RS 18K CR ($ 4,010,695,091) INDONESIAN PROJECT BY JUNE - MSN
MSN reported that, State-owned NALCO today said it has selected UAE-based RAK Minerals as JV partner for its Rs 18,000 crore (US$ 4,010,695,091 ...
Monday, 13 December 10
DEUTSCHE BANK RAISES COAL FORECASTS ON MARKET SHORTAGE - BLOOMBERG
Deutsche Bank AG raised price forecasts for thermal coal by as much as 17 percent on expectations that a shortage of the fuel will widen over the ne ...
Monday, 13 December 10
K SERA SERA TO SPEND RS325CR TO BUY COAL,OIL & GAS FIRMS STAKE - LIVE MINT
The company might have to dole out around Rs 225 crore (US$ 50,122,522) for picking up the majority stake in the coal mine in Indonesia and around R ...
Thursday, 09 December 10
OVERSUPPLY OF SHIPS BOUND TO KEEP DRY BULK FREIGHT RATES SUBDUED DURING 2011 SAYS BIMCO - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
An oversupply of vessels is expected to keep freight rates from flying as high as in recent years said a relative shipping report from BIMCO’s ...
Thursday, 09 December 10
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE REACHED US$ 103.41 PMT FOR DECEMBER DELIVERY
COALspot.com: The Directorate General of Mineral, Coal and Geothermal of Indonesia has been publishing a monthly coal price reference (HBA) since Fe ...
|
|
|
Showing 5496 to 5500 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Australian Coal Association
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|