We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 15 December 10
SMALLER DRY BULK VESSELS ARE LOOKING UP, LARGER ONES FAIL TO DELIVER - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market lost further ground at the beginning of the week, in what could prove one of the slowest periods ship owners have been faced. Ye ...
Tuesday, 14 December 10
COAL IMPORTS MAY INCREASE 78% TO CHINA, INDIA: ENERGY MARKETS - BUSINESS WEEK
Business Week reported that, China and India may increase imports of coal by 78 percent to 337 million metric tons next year, further driving up pri ...
Tuesday, 14 December 10
BANPU PLANNING PRODUCTION BOOM - BANGKOK POST
Australian, Indonesian output to lead growth
Bangkok Post reported that, Banpu Plc, Asean's largest coal miner, wants to nearly double its coal ...
Tuesday, 14 December 10
THE FREIGHT RATES FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA AND CHINA REMAINED FIRM - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com - The freight market continued to be soft with the Cape sector most effected which was down by 289 points and closed at 2,694 poi ...
Monday, 13 December 10
ICE FUTURES EUROPE TO LAUNCH IHS MCCLOSKEY INDONESIAN SUB-BITUMINOUS FOB MARKER COAL CONTRACTS - MONDOVISIONE
Mondovisione reported that, IntercontinentalExchange (NYSE: ICE), a leading operator of global regulated futures exchanges, clearing houses and over ...
|
|
|
Showing 5491 to 5495 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- The University of Queensland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|
