We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 26 June 21
KOSPO INVITED BIDS FOR 480,000 MT OF COAL PER ANNUM
COALspot.com: Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO) has issued an International tender for total 480,000 MT of NCV 1 Min. 5,600 (Spec 1) /Min. 5,0 ...
Thursday, 24 June 21
FEBRUARY'S INCREASE IN COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC GENERATION REDUCED U.S. COAL STOCKPILES - EIA
Coal stockpiles at U.S. power plants decreased significantly from December 2020 to February 2021, including a draw of nearly 16 million tons in Feb ...
Wednesday, 23 June 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The first half of 2021 has brought a very sharp and continued recovery in the dry bulk market and while many where expecting a relatively strong ma ...
Thursday, 17 June 21
2020 PROVED TO BE A TRULY TERRIBLE YEAR FOR GLOBAL SEABORNE COAL TRADE; CHINA'S COAL IMPORTS - BANCHERO COSTA
2020 proved to be a truly terrible year for global seaborne coal trade.
Total global loadings in the 12 months of 2020 were down -12 ...
Thursday, 17 June 21
FITCH RATINGS RAISES SHORT-TERM OIL AND GAS PRICE ASSUMPTIONS
Fitch Ratings has increased its 2021 and 2022 oil price assumptions for the Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) benchmarks due to stronger year ...
|
|
|
Showing 546 to 550 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Minerals Council of Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
