We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 June 21
BUMA SIGNED MINING AGREEMENT WITH ADARO
PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk. announced that its subsidiary, PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama ("BUMA"), has entered into an agreement for the p ...
Wednesday, 30 June 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The strong freight performance since the beginning of year has continued for the dry bulk market with earnings being at the highest level in over a ...
Monday, 28 June 21
MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF INDONESIA THREATENS TO REVOKE 2,350 MINING BUSINESS PERMITS
The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources said that the revocation of mining business permits was in accordance with President Jokowi's inst ...
Sunday, 27 June 21
INDONESIA'S STATE-OWNED UTILITY PLN'S 2060 NET ZERO AMBITION NOT WITHOUT FLAWS AND GAPS - IEEFA
Indonesia on the right emissions reduction pathway but same old coal stories persist
Recent announcements by Indonesia’s state-owned uti ...
Saturday, 26 June 21
COAL PRICES HIT DECADE HIGH DESPITE EFFORTS TO WEAN THE WORLD OFF CARBON - WSJ
Rebounding electricity usage and scanty rainfall in China have added fuel to the rally
Coal prices have climbed to their highest lev ...
|
|
|
Showing 541 to 545 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The University of Queensland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Coal Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
|
| |
| |
|