We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 June 11
INDIKA AIMS TO PRODUCE 31 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN 2011 - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post, a leading English news paper in Indonesia reported that, PT Indika Energy Tbk, an integrated energy company, is targeting to incre ...
Wednesday, 08 June 11
BAYAN TO DISTRIBUTE RP. 80 ( APPROX. US$ 0.00939850) PER SHARE DIVIDEND
Coal miner PT Bayan Resources Tbk (BYAN), that is controlled by business Dato' Low Tuck Kwong, will distribute Rp80 a share dividend or Rp266.7 bil ...
Wednesday, 08 June 11
CBM PRODUCTION FROM AUSTRALIA, CHINA, INDIA, AND INDONESIA IS EXPECTED TO WITNESS A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE BY 2015
Press Release - According to Global Data (December 2010), CBM production in Australia, China, India, and Indonesia is expected to witness a signific ...
Sunday, 05 June 11
COAL IMPORTS BY CHINA IS LIKELY TO INCREASE - VISTAAR SINGAPORE
COALspot.com - The freight market softened this week except for the BDI and Cape index was up, but even in these sectors the momentum was compared t ...
Friday, 03 June 11
DRY BULK MARKETS RESURGENCE APPEARS TO BE LOSING SOME STEAM - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market’s seems to be losing some steam, despite reports of growing Chinese demand for commodities, especially coal, on the back o ...
|
|
|
Showing 5236 to 5240 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
